Scholarly Peers
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings
Journal articles
What does open peer review bring to scientific articles? Evidence from PLoS journals
Wei et al.
| 2023 |
Scientometrics
Towards peer review as a group engagement
Bonaccorsi
| 2023 |
JLIS.it
Changing the culture of peer review for a more inclusive and equitable psychological science
Aly et al.
| 2022 |
PsyArXiv Preprints
Transparent peer review for all
Editorial
| 2022 |
Nature Communications
Scientific autonomy, public accountability, and the rise of "peer review" in the Cold War United States
Baldwin
| 2018 |
Isis
The ecology of peer review: Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives
Allen et al. | 2022 |
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice
Towards improved understanding of students and junior scholars as authors, reviewers, editors and leaders in scholarly publishing
(OA!)
Steur & Plancarte-Escobar | 2022 |
Learned Publishing
Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
Besançon et al. | 2020 |
Res Integr Peer Rev
Objectivity of the peer-review process: Enduring myth, reality, and possible remedies
Philippe C. Baveye
| 2021 |
Learned Publishing
Editors publishing in their own journals: A systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of normative aspects
Gert Helgesson,Igor Radun,Jenni Radun & Gustav Nilsonne
| 2022 |
Learned Publishing
Peer review: economy, identity, diversity
Clark & Jagsi
|
2021
|
European Science Editing
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review
Balazs Aczel , Barnabas Szaszi & Alex O Holcombe
| 2021 |
Res Integr Peer Rev
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
Severin & Chataway | 2020 |
Learned Publishing
What is open peer review? A systematic review
Ross-Hellauer | 2017 |
F1000 Research
Peer review for journals as it stands today – part 1
-part 2
Campanario | 1998 |
Science Communication
Online resources
The peer-review process is in need of some scrutiny
Basen
| 2023 | The Globe and Mail
Should the identity of peer reviewers be open?
Reinhart & Dawson | 2022
Feminist Review
peer review honorariums
Feminist Review | 2022
Open Peer Review
F1000
Types of peer review
Wiley
Blog
Peer review is broken. Paying referees could help fix it
Money
|
2023
|
Times Higher Education
Yes, peer review sucks. But attention - economy hellscapes would be worse
de Vries
|
2023
|
Times Higher Education
4 reasons to prioritize peer review software in the new year
2023
|
Scholastic
The rise and fall of peer review
Mastroianni
| 2022 |
Experimental History
Transparent peer review: are authors willing to publish referee reports?
Davies
| 2022 |
The Publication Plan
There are four schools of thought on reforming peer review - can they co-exist?
Waltman et al.
| 2022 |
LSE Blog
The researchers using AI to analyse peer review
Van Noorden
| 2022 |
Nature News Q&A
Peer review - issues, limitations, and future development
Velterop | 2015
Papers in high-impact journals 'have more statistical errors'
Upton | 2022
Open science and open peer-review platform for UCL Press
Jasini
| 2022
A workflow for open peer review: Case study UCL Press
Dawson
| 2022 |
Science Open Blog
Interview series: Meet the editors
Cook | 2022 |
ECHER Blog
The peer-review crisis
Flaherty | 2022 |
Insider Higher Education
What is peer review and why is it important?
Sleeman | 2022 |
De Gruyter Conversations
The peer review system is broken. We asked academics how to fix it
Allen et al. | 2022 |
The Conversation
Supporting doctoral students and early career researchers in journal peer review in educational research: Issues and suggestions (part 2)
Chong | 2022 |
BERA Blog
Supporting doctoral students and early career researchers in journal peer review in educational research: Issues and suggestions (Part 1)
Chong | 2022 |
BERA Blog
Parallel peer review at Cell Press: An interview with Deborah Sweet
Vines | 2020 |
Scholarly Kitchen
Self-organising peer review for preprints – a future paradigm for scholarly publishing
LingFeng | 2019 |
LSE Impact Blog
Predatory publishers’ latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers
Kyle Siler , Philippe Vincent-Lamarre , Cassidy R. Sugimoto & Vincent Larivière
| 2021
|
Nature
Peer review for academic jobs and grants continues to be shaped by metrics, especially if your reviewer is highly ranked
Liv Langfeldt, Dag W. Aksnes & Ingvild Reymert
|
2021
|
LSE
**All links are shared without comment**
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings