Scholarly Peers
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings
Journal articles
The chaperone effect in scientific publishing
Sekara et al.
| 2022 |
PNAS
The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing
Vuong | 2022 |
Learned Publishing
Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research
Superchi et al. | 2019 |
BMJ Open
Does double-blind peer review impact gender authorship trends? An evaluation of two leading neurosurgical journals from 2010 to 2019
Uma V. Mahajan
et al. | 2020 | Journal of Neurosurgery
The challenges of peer-review process
Sanjukta Bhaumik
| 2021 |
International Journal of Applied Research
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Giangiacomo Bravo
| 2019 |
Nature Communications
Education, Ethics, and History: The Peer Review Process in the US
Bryan K.Richmond
et al. | 2019 |
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Re-enchanting Modernity in the East and West: Comparative Perspectives on the Legacy of 1968. An Author Meets Her Reviewers: A Symposium
Kristina Andělová
| 2021|
East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
Peer review: the case for neutral language
Christine E.Parsons
| 2021| Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
Anna Severin
et al. | 2020 |
Learned Publishing
Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
Jon Patricios
et al. | 2021| Sports Medicine
Is Peer Review a Good Idea?
Remco Heesen & Liam Kofi Bright Home
|
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Who's Afraid of Peer Review?
John Bohannon
| 2013| Science
Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
Patricios J, et al.
| 2021|
Br J Sports Med Month
Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant?
Serge P. J. M. Horbach & Willem Halffman
| 2020|
Minerva
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
Flaminio Squazzoni
et al.
| 2021|
Science Advances
Navigating the qualitative manuscript writing process: some tips for authors and reviewers
Chris Roberts
et al.
| 2021|
BMC Medical Education
Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study
Marko Zdravkovic
et al.
| 2021| PLOS ONE
Why quantitative papers based on primary data get desk-rejected by Annals of Tourism Research
SaraDolnicar
| 2020|
Annals of Tourism Research
Editorial: An age of Enlightenment or Information Overload?
T. R. C. Davis
| 2004| Journal of hand surgery
Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
Lonni Besançon
| 2020|
Research Integrity and Peer Review
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
Anna Severin & Joanna Chataway
| 2020| Learned Publishing
How Gendered Is the Peer-Review Process? A Mixed-Design Analysis of Reviewer Feedback
Thomas König & Guido Ropers
| 2021|
Cambridge University Press
Does double-blind peer review impact gender authorship trends? An evaluation of two leading neurosurgical journals from 2010 to 2019
Uma V. Mahajan et al.
| 2020| Journal of Neurosurgery
Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers
Anthony F. Jorm
| 2021 | Learned Publishing
Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research
Cecilia Superchi
et al.
| 2019| BMJ Open
The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers
Akira Matsui
| 2021| Peer J
Open-access journal eLife announces ‘preprint first’ publishing model
Diana Kwon
|
2020 | Nature
If you can’t be kind in peer review, be neutral
2020 | Nature
How to Write a Thorough Peer Review Report
2021 | Enago Academy
Looking at the bigger PICture: Understanding and counteracting the decline of persistent inward currents in older adults
Lucas B R Orssatto
|2021
| The Journal of Psysiology
Online media
Delete offensive language? Change recommendations? Some editors say it’s ok to alter peer reviews
O’Grady | 2020 |
Science Mag
Open Peer Review
Open Research Europe
POLL RESULTS: Manuscript Submitted Before Author Approvals and Data Checks – Now What?
Eric Y. Wong
|
2021| Ismpp newsletter
What’s Wrong with Paying for Peer Review?
Tim Vines & Alison Mudditt
| 2021| The Scholarly Kitchen
3 areas of peer review journals should regularly audit
How to Receive and Respond to Peer Review Feedback
East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
Aileen Fyfe
| 2019 | The Royal Society
What’s peer review? 5 things you should know before covering research
Denise-Marie Ordway | 2021 | The Journalist's Resources
Is your journal's peer review system as efficient as it could be? Questions to ask
Scholastica
5 Ways academic journals can increase diversity in peer review
Scholastica
Case discussion: Editing peer review comments
2020 | COPE
Revisiting: Balancing Author Satisfaction with Reviewer Needs
Angela Cochran
| 2021| The scholarly kitchen
The dawn of the age of duplicate peer review
Tim Vines
| 2021| The scholarly kitchen
Ask The Chefs: How Does Identity Influence Peer Review?
Ann Micheal
et al. | 2021| The scholarly kitchen
Open Reviewer Identities: Full Steam Ahead or Proceed with Caution?
VÉRONIQUE KIERMER & ALISON MUDDITT
| 2021| The scholarly kitchen
Guest Post — Why the “Who” of Peer Review is Important
Matt Giampoala
et al. | 2021| The scholarly kitchen
Why is inclusivity important when thinking about identity as part of Peer Review Week 2021?
Megan Taylor
| 2021 | The International Bunch
5 Ways academic journals can increase diversity in peer review
2021 | Scholastica
From publishers
Engaging and retaining peer reviewers from small member society journals
Wascavage | 2020 |
Wiley
Growing trust in peer review with the better peer review initiative
Willis | 2020 |
Wiley
Blog
Less 'prestigious' journals can contain more diverse research, by citing them we can shape a more just politics of citation
Mason & Merga
| 2021| LSE Blog
Happy 2023 from ScienceOpen!
Dawson
|
2020 | ScienceOpen
4 ways to increase peer review transparency to foster greater trust in the process
2020 | Scholastica
Joining the ‘great conversation’ – The fundamental role of annotation in academic society
Remi Kalir
| 2021| LSE Blog
How the pandemic changed editorial peer review – and why we should wonder whether that’s desirable
Serge Horbach
| 2021| LSE Blog
Guest Post: Peer review in transition?
2021| Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association
Reading Peer Review – What a dataset of peer review reports can teach us about changing research culture
Martin Eve et al.
| 2021| LSE Blog
8 common problems with literature reviews and how to fix them
Neal Haddaway
| 2020| LSE Blog
Peer review processes risk stifling creativity and limiting opportunities for game-changing scientific discoveries
Blog Admin
| 2017| LSE Blog
What the pandemic has taught us about science
Mattridley
| 2020
Peer-review models: Thoughts on the impact of common categories
Katiscia
| 2021
Fact or Fake? The question of anonymity in peer review
Louisa Ha
| 2021
Including and valuing postdocs in peer review
Gary McDowell
| 2021
Five models of peer review: a guide
Rhiannon Meaden & Sarah Mckenna
| 2021
Published Peer Review History. What can you learn?
Plos
Other
Five ways to facilitate good reviews at your journal
Allen | 2020 | Technica Editorial
**All links are shared without comment**
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings