Scholarly Peers
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings
Journal articles
From the editor's desk: Objectivity in manuscript review - where is the line?
Bates et al.
| 2023 |
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Anonymizing peer review makes the process more just
Gilbert
| 2023 |
Nature
Self-publishing is common among academic-journal editors
King
| 2023 |
Nature
Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Oviedo-García
| 2021 |
Research Evaluation
Editors publishing in their own journals: A systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of normative aspects
(OA!)
Helgesson et al. | 2022 |
Learned Publishing
What publishers can take away from the latest early career researcher research
David Nicholas
et al
.,
| 2018 |
Learned Publishing
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
Wicherts
|
2016
|
PLoS ONE
Publishing more than reviewing? Some ethical musings on the sustainability of the peer review process
Lindebaum & Jordan
|
2021
|
Organization
Transparency in peer review: Exploring the content and tone of reviewers’ confidential comments to editors
Bridget C. et al.
| 2021 |
Plos One
Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons)
Yan Lei
| 2021 |
Wiley Online library
Bias in peer review
Lee et al. | 2013 |
Advances in Information Science
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
Squazzoni et al. | 2021 |
Science Advances
Gender and other potential biases in peer review …
Severin | 2020 |
BMJ Open
Websites
Exclusive: PLOS ONE to retract more than 100 papers for manipulated peer review
2022 |
Retraction Watch
Blog posts
Reflections on guest editing a Frontiers journal
Horbach et al.
| 2022
Is peer-review biased? Locating inequality in global academic publishing in the neoliberal system
Anna Kristina Hultgren
| 2022
Why is inclusivity important when thinking about identity as part of Peer Review Week 2021?
Megan Taylor
| 2021
Identity and integrity in peer review: the role of co-reviewing
Jessica Truschel
| 2021
Benefits and Drawbacks of Open Peer Review
Lex Academic
| 2021
Peer review processes risk stifling creativity and limiting opportunities for game-changing scientific discoveries
Braben & Dowler | 2017 |
LSE Impact Blog
Style, tone and grammar – native speaker bias in peer reviews
Thompson | 2020 |
patter
Guidelines and policies
Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers
COPE | 2019
What to do if you suspect peer review manipulation
COPE | 2018
Discussion thread
In single-blind peer-review, can you reveal your identity without the editor’s consent?
Stack Exchange | 2015
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings