Scholarly Peers
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings
Journal articles
Feedback practices in journal peer-review: A systematic literature review (OA!)
Chong & Lin
| 2023 |
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Bringing light to a hidden genre: The peer review report
(OA!)
Mason & Chong | 2022 |
Higher Education Research & Development
To my reviewers, with respect and gratitude: Guidelines for an author
(OA!)
Iwaz | 2022 |
Learned Publishing
Peer review in linguistics journals: Best practices and emerging standards
Alexandra D'Arcy & Joseph Salmons
|
2021
|
Language
The good, the bad and the rude peer-review
Mavrogenis et al. | 2020 |
International Orthopaedics
Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers
Lovejoy et al. | 2011 |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Navigating the qualitative manuscript writing process: some tips for authors and reviewers
Roberts et al. | 2020 |
BMC Medical Education
Improving peer-review by developing reviewers' feedback literacy
Sin Wang Chong | 2021 | Learning publishing
The Art of Reviewing Manuscripts
Anastassia N. Alexandrova* & Gregory V. Hartland
| 2021 |
J. Phys. Chem. C
German Professors’ Motivation to Act as Peer Reviewers in Accreditation and Evaluation Procedures
Sandra Ohly & Christian Schneijderbergv| 2021 | Minerva
Don’t be reviewer 2! Reflections on writing effective peer review comments
Chris Watling
et al. | 2021 |
Perspectives on Medical Education
AI-assisted peer review
Alessandro Checco
et al. | 2021 |
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Purposes of peer review: A qualitative study of stakeholder expectations and perceptions
Anna Severin & Joanna Chataway
| 2020 | Learning Publishing
A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers
Eunhye Song
| 2021 | Plos One
Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science
Dietmar Wolfram et.al
| 2020 |
Scientometrics
Publishing more than reviewing? Some ethical musings on the sustainability of the peer review process
Dirk Lindebaum & Peter J Jordan
| 2021 | Sage Journals
Book chapters
We are all reviewer 2: a window into the secret world of peer review
Tardy | 2018 |
Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication
Online media
Transparent peer review
Wiley
Types of peer review
Wiley
If you can’t be kind in peer review, be neutral
Baglini & Parsons | 2020 |
Nature
Published Peer Review History. What can you learn?
Baglini & Parsons | 2020 |
Nature
Open peer review
F1000 Research
Open Peer Review
Plos
We asked researchers whether an author's identity influences perceptions about their work
Sneha Kulkarni
| 2021|
Editage
How to be an effective peer reviewer and help your career
Alicia James | 2021| University Word News
Blog posts
Don't be cruel: How to write a fair peer review report
Chong & Mason | 2022
Why a Crowd-Sourced Peer-Review System Would Be Good for Philosophy (guest post)
Justin Weinberg
| 2022
Peer reviewing your first paper
Thompson | 2019 |
patter
How to write helpful peer review comments
Padula | 2015 |
Scholastica
Confessions of a rookie reviewer
Flynn | 2020 |
Pathway to PhD
Writing a peer review is a structured process that can be learned and improved
Wilkinson | 2017 |
LSE Impact Blog
How to Write a Thorough Peer Review Report
Enago Academy
Writing a peer review is a structured process that can be learned and improved – 12 steps to follow
Jo Wilkinson
| 2017 |
LSE Impact Blog
Why, When and How? 10 Tips for Academic Book Reviewers
Fleur Johns
| 20201|
LSE Impact Blog
Can AI be used ethically to assist peer review?
Alessandro Checco et al. | 2021 | LSE Blog
How the pandemic changed editorial peer review – and why we should wonder whether that’s desirable
Serge Horbach
|
2021 | LSE Blog
Identity and integrity in peer review: the role of co-reviewing
Serge Horbach
| 2021 | LSE Blog
Responding to peer review: A guide to producing actionable knowledge to improve your work while keeping control of your research
Nick Hopwood
| 2021
Podcasts
Can (Should) ECRs be peer reviewers? Demystifying the feedback process in scholarly peer review
Jessica Truschel | 2021 |
F1000 Blognetwork
From publishers
Taylor & Francis’ peer review checklist
Taylor & Francis
10 tips for getting started as a peer reviewer
PLoS
For reviewers
F1000 Research
Journal Reviewer gateway
Sage
Ten tips for a truly terrible peer review
Elsevier
**All links are shared without comment**
Home
ECR Reviewers
Resources
Podcasts
Blog Posts
Call for book Chapters
2022 Symposium Recordings